|  |  RESEARCH ON MULTI-ANTENNA RECEIVERSAND MIMO SYSTEMS  1993-2002
 Signals and Systems, Uppsala University 
 
 Researchers: 
  A Ahlén,
  E Lindskog,
  M Sternad  
  C Tidestav and
  M Wennström 
 
 
 
In wireless mobile radio communication, there is an endless quest for
increased capacity and improved quality.
Within this area, we have during the last years studied ways
to utilize antennas with multiple elements in an intelligent way.
 Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Systems 
for Wireless CommunicationsIn communication theory, 
MIMO refers to radio   links with multiple antennas at the 
transmitter and the receiver side. Given
  multiple antennas, the spatial dimension can be exploited 
to improve the
  performance of the wireless link. The performance is 
often measured as the
  average bit rate (bit/s) the wireless link can provide or
 as the average bit
  error rate (BER). Which one has most importance 
depends on the application. Given a MIMO channel, 
duplex method and a
  transmission bandwidth, the system can be 
categorized as 
 
  ·
 
         
  Flat or frequency selective fading 
 
 ·
        
  
  With full, limited or without transmitter channel
  state information (CSI) Where full CSI 
means the knowledge of the
  complete MIMO channel transfer function.
 In a TDD system with a duplex time
  less than the coherence time of the channel,
 full CSI is available at the
  transmitter, since then, the channel is reciprocal. 
In FDD systems, there
  commonly exists a feedback channel from the 
receiver to the transmitter that
  provides the transmitter with some partial CSI. 
This could be information of
  which subgroup of antennas to be used or which 
eigenmode of the channel that
  is strongest. It is also possible to achieve a highly 
robust wireless link
  without any CSI at the transmitter, by using
 transmit diversity. Diversity
  can be achieved through so called space-time codes,
 like the Alamouti code
  for two transmit antennas and high bit
 rates is achieved by spatial
  multiplexing systems, such as the pioneer
 system from Bell Labs abbreviated
  as BLAST.  If a broadband wireless connection is desired,
  the symbol rate must be increased further 
which at some point will lead to a
  frequency selective channel. Then, there
 are two ways to go, either we employ
  pre- or post-equalization of the channel 
or we divide the channel into many
  narrowband flat fading sub-channels, 
a technique utilized by OFDM, and
  transmit our data on these sub streams, 
without the need for channel equalization.
  Hence, it is always possible to convert a
 frequency selective channel to many
  flat fading channels using OFDM and
 apply the developed flat fading MIMO
  signalling techniques to each of these sub-channels. 
Our research on MIMO systems has so far considered
  flat fading MIMO channels, with or without 
CSI at the transmitter. Some
  results from our research is shown below 
MIMO with full CSI at the transmitter
When full CSI is available at the transmitter,
  it is possible to transmit data on the MIMO 
channel eigenmodes. A MIMO system
  with N transmit antennas and M receive 
antennas has min(N,M) eigenmodes. The
  gain of these eigenmodes is proportional 
to the singular values of the MIMO
  channel, so they have disparate power. 
We propose to use adaptive modulation
  techniques to transmit over these eigenmodes, 
to maximize the bit rate or
  minimize the BER of the transmission.  
  
    
The figure above shows the data throughput
  (bit/(sHz)) as a function of total transmit 
power for a 4 times 4 MIMO system
  in a Rayleigh fading channel. 
The blue curve is the Shannon limit and the
  dashed curve the throughput of the 
BER is fixed at the target 10^(-5). In
  practice, the data rates chosen for the 
sub-channels can not be arbitrarily
  chosen, they must belong to the 
discrete set of modulation types
  (BPSK,QPSK,16QAM,…) so the dotted 
curve shows the throughput when adopting
  the discrete rates. The figure below 
show the rate per subchannel
  corresponding to the figure above. 
We see that the subchannel with the lowest
  gain is only used when the total power 
(SNR) is larger than 26 dB.  
  
    
 MIMO performance
 in correlated channels with  no CSI at the transmitter
When CSI is not available at the transmitter,
  transmit diversity at a low implementation
 complexity can be achieved with
  orthogonal space-time block codes (STBC).
 Multiple antennas at a portable
  device imply that the antenna spacing has 
to be small. This implies that the
  signals that enter the different antennas 
will be correlated and the
  performance will degrade. An important 
parameter in the model for the
  scattering channel is the angle spread D 
of the received signals. With small
  antenna element spacing, the mutual
 coupling can be significant, and in our model
  the electromagnetic coupling has been 
taken into account.  
  
   
The figure above shows the outage capacity at
  10% probability, which roughly is the bit 
rate per Hz of bandwidth that can
  be transmitted over the 2 times 2 MIMO 
Rayleigh fading channel 90% of the
  time when varying the antenna element 
separation  (assuming dipoles). 
The i.i.d. Rayleigh fading channel is
  also shown as a reference, and we see clearly
 how the correlation (introduced
  by the angle spread D) reduce the capacity
 of the channel. When mutual
  coupling is taken into account, the curves 
oscillate, due to the oscillating
  behaviour of the mutual impedance 
between two adjacent dipoles. 
It is  interesting to note that when the 
signals are highly correlated (D=6   degrees), 
the mutual coupling actually improves
 the outage capacity for small   antenna element spacing,
 by decorrelation of the signals. 
 
 
 Algorithms for Combined Spatial and Temporal Equalization
in TDMA
The received baseband signal in a
TDMA cellular system
is corrupted by noise, by intersymbol interference due to
multipath propagation and by co-channel interference from 
other users.
If only one antenna element is available at the receiver
one can use filtering of the received time series
in order to estimate the transmitted sequence,
i.e. temporal equalization. If several antenna elements are available,
it becomes possible to perform spatial filtering by
forming beams in the direction of a desired signal.
Noise and interference and also delayed signals
which would result in intersymbol interference,
can then be suppressed if they arrive from other directions.
 
The beamforming concept can be combined with temporal
equalization, resulting in spatio-temporal equalization.
It then becomes possible to make effective use of
the energy in delayed signals arriving from several directions,
while suppressing the signals from co-channel interferers.
 
Spatio-temporal equalization can be performed by generalizing
the single-input-single-output
 
(SISO) DFE
to a
multiple-input-single-output (MISO) DFE. 
One can also use a MLSE Viterbi detector. 
 
A MISO DFE will, by necessity, contain a larger number of
adjustable parameters than a SISO DFE.
This leads to two potential problems.
 
  These two key issues have been investigated, for different
filter structures and different adjustment schemes.
The structure of one promising algorithm,
the Multiple Independent Beam Decision Feedback
Equalizer (MIB-DFE), is illustrated below. The adjustment of many filter parameters, based on
         short training sequences, is sensitive to noise. Misadjustment
         may lead to poor performance.
   The computational complexity of the algorithm will increase.
 
 ![[MIB-DFE]](../Images/jpegs/diversity1.jpg)  
 
When multiple antenna elements are present, we may investigate
the still harder task of detecting several users simultaneously,
on the same frequency band. Our research in this direction
is described on our page on
 multiuser detection.
 
The use of arrays of antenna elements is practical at the base station,
but much less practical at the mobile. 
The investigated techniques are therefore primarily applicable in the
transmission from the mobiles to the base stations.
 Channel reuse within cell
In a TDMA system, the combination of a certain time 
slot and a certain frequency is called a channel.
 In a cellular system, every channel is used by multiple
 base stations. However, due to interference from one 
base station to another, not all channels are used in all
 cells. Instead, channels are reused at a certain interval. 
The interval with which the channels are reused is called
 the reuse distance. In a GSM system, the reuse 
distance is between 9 and 30. 
In the future, the spatial dimension must be exploited 
more thoroughly. The first step is of course to decrease 
the reuse distance. This is the primary objective for the 
algorithms described above. If every channel could be 
used in each cell, the system capacity would rise by a factor 
equal to the reuse distance in the current system. But if an
 even larger increase in capacity is desired, we have to lower
 the reuse distance below one or, in other words, 
perform channel reuse within cell. 
 
The algorithms previously described could actually be 
used as tools for such a scheme. For such an application, 
one of the users in the cell is considered as "desired", 
whereas the remaining users are considered as "interference". 
The signals from the other users will in this case be 
considered as nothing but colored noise, which  can be 
significantly suppressed by using combined temporal and 
spatial equalization.
  
 ![[TITO channel model]](../Images/GIFS/TITOchannel.gif) Another option would be to consider the signals as signals 
rather than as colored noise. We could in this case use the 
property that all signals are digital, i.e., they can only assume
 a finite number of values. The model would in this case
 be a multiple input-multiple output  (MIMO) channel 
model. As input we would use the transmitted symbols 
from all users, and as output the sampled output from the 
antenna. The situation is depicted to the right for a case 
with two users and two antennas. 
The problem of interference suppression has then 
become a problem of multiuser detection. We can 
then use a multiuser detector to detect both signals 
simultaneously. The problem is very similar to the 
multiuser detection 
problem encountered in a DS-CDMA system.
 
To solve this multiuser detection problem, it is possible to 
use generalisations of any equalizer used to mitigate
 intersymbol interference, i.e. a linear equalizer, a decision 
feedback equalizer or the Viterbi algorithm. 
The generalisation is relatively straightforward. 
The derivation is based on a multivariable channel model of the form
  
 ![[MIMO channel model]](../Images/GIFS/MIMO_model_ant.gif)  
Here, d is a vector of input symbol and y is a vector of 
channel outputs. The matrix coefficients B 
constitute the channel and are the basis for the equalizer design.
 
 ![[Performance of channel reuse within cell]](../Images/GIFS/MIMODFE_antperf.gif)  
We have derived a multivariable DFE to solve the 
multiuser detection problem. This multivariable DFE 
is described in greater detail in the section 
Research on multiuser 
detectors for CDMA based cellular systems. 
To address the performance of this multiuser detector, 
we have performed simulations in a scenario which 
resembles a GSM system with two users and two 
antennas in each cell. As were the case for the CDMA 
system, it is of interest to investigate the performance 
when the received powers of the users are very different.
 In this case, the transmit powers of the users are either 
equal or differ by 20 dB.
 
The structure of the transmission is similar to the 
structure in GSM: the data is transmitted in bursts 
of length 148 with a training sequence of length 26 in
 the middle. Parameter estimation was performed using 
ordinary LS. We simulated the system for signal to noise 
ratios between 5 and 20 dB. We compared the performance 
to the performance of a corresponding system where one 
user and one antenna were removed.
 
As can be seen, the system performs better with two 
users and two antennas than with one antenna and
 one user. This algorithm will also be applied to 
measurements from an antenna array. These measurements 
are supplied by Ericsson.
 
Publications:  
PhD Thesis by Mattias Wennström, 2002. on MIMO systems
and antennasPhD Thesis by Claes Tidestav, 1999, on MIMO DFE's
 PhD Thesis by Erik Lindskog, 1999, on space-time methods.
 Licentiate Thesis by Erik Lindskog, 1995.
 Licentiate Thesis by Stefano Bigi, 1995, which considers
  the design of SISO IIR DFE's based on short data records.
 
 
  Paper
  (IEEE SP 2001), on multivariable DFE's for multiuser detection.
Paper
  (IEEE Com'99), on enabling channel reuse within a TDMA cell.
 
 
 
  Conference  paper
  (ICC'02), on reduced rank channel estimation in CDMA systems.
Workshop paper
  on  the optimality and performance of transmit and
   receive space diversity in MIMO channels.
 Conference paper
  (VTC'99), on enabling channel reuse within a TDMA cell.
 Conference paper
  (VTC'99), on reduced rank channel estimation.
 Conference paper
  (ICASSP'99), on the structure and design of 
  MIMO Decision Feedback equalizers.
 Conference paper
  (EUSIPCO'98), on exploiting pulse shaping informantion.
 Conference paper
  (IEEE ICUPC'98), on "Bootstrap equalization"
 Conference paper
  (IEEE VTC'97), on the implementation of Viterbi detectors
  in antenna array receivers.
 Conference paper
  (IEEE ICUPC'96), on using direction-of-arrival parametrization.
 Beamforming
  with the sample matrix inversion method for a GSM
  signal with sampling offset (IEEE PIMRC'95)
 Combined spatial and temporal equalization  
   using an adaptive antenna  array
   and a decision feedback equalization scheme (IEEE ICASSP'95).
 Spatio-temporal equalization
   for multipath environments in mobile radio applications 
  (IEEE VTC'95).
 Indirect  
   spatio-temporal equalization and adaptive interference cancellation
   for multipath environments in mobile radio applications.
 Conference paper
  (IEEE PIMRC'95), on the MIMO DFE as a multiuser detector.
 Conference paper
  (Asilomar'95), on utilizing adjacent  TDMA frames.
 Master's Thesis by Claes Tidestav, 1993, 
addressing the impact of antenna correlation.
 
 |